Showing posts with label Donald Trump. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Donald Trump. Show all posts

Monday, 18 February 2019

U.K. youngster who joined Islamic State conceives an offspring in Syrian displaced person camp



LONDON - A youngster who joined the Islamic State amass in Syria however at this point needs to profit to Britain for Sunday conceived an offspring in an evacuee camp, as European governments think about how to manage returning jihadis in front of a U.S. troop pullout.

Shamima Begum, whose destiny has blended discussion as far back as she and two companions fled London to join the fear organize in 2015 matured only 15, revealed to Sky News she had conveyed a kid.

"I just conceived an offspring so I'm truly worn out," the 19-year-old said as she made a recharged intrigue to be permitted once again into Britain with her infant.

"I'm apprehensive he may even pass on in this camp. I feel many individuals ought to have compassion toward me, for all that I've experienced," she said.

"I didn't have the foggiest idea what I was getting into when I left. I simply was trusting that perhaps for me and my kid they let me return," she included.

Her case comes as European countries battle with how to manage jihadis anxious to return home after the crumbling of Islamic State's "caliphate" in eastern Syria.

U.S. President Donald Trump again requested on Saturday that they reclaim many caught IS warriors.

Trump said on Twitter that the United States was asking Britain and other mainland partners "to reclaim more than 800 ISIS warriors that we caught in Syria and put them on preliminary.

The interest came as he arranged — in front of the pullout of U.S. troops — to proclaim the gathering's caliphate pulverized, with U.S.- drove Arab and Kurdish powers near catching its last Syrian regional holdout.

"The U.S. does not have any desire to look as these ISIS warriors pervade Europe," Trump included.

"Time for others to venture up and carry out the responsibility that they are so equipped for doing. We are pulling back after 100% Caliphate triumph!"

Begum recently brought forth two other youngsters subsequent to wedding in Syria. The two kids kicked the bucket.

Driving legislators, including inside priest Sajid Javid, have pledged to keep her arrival, indicating her absence of regret for joining the fear gathering.

Begum revealed to Sky News she knew about Islamic State's merciless strategies, including directing executions, yet did not lament going to Syria.

"I thought about those things and I approved of it at first," she said. "They deal with youn… you're living under Islamic law.

"I don't think twice about it since it's transformed me as an individual, made me more grounded, harder."

The adolescent, who said she had no contact with British authorities, included the legislature ought not hinder her homecoming since she was "only a housewife" while there.

"I never made purposeful publicity, I never urged individuals to come to Syria.

"They don't generally have evidence that I did whatever is hazardous," she said.

Europe has for quite some time been pondering how to react to outside contenders, and their supporters or wards, got in Syria.

Anyway the approaching U.S. flight has made a due date for those legislatures whose residents joined IS and have now been caught by the U.S.- supported, Kurdish-drove Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF).

England's administration seems split on the issue.

Culture Secretary Jeremy Wright, a previous lawyer general — the nation's boss lawful counselor — told the BBC on Sunday that it was "obliged, at some phase at any rate, to take them back.

He noted it was "a matter of global law and local law.

Notwithstanding, writing in The Sunday Times — under the feature "on the off chance that you flee to join ISIS, I will utilize all my capacity to stop you returning" — Javid demanded the legislature should strip "perilous people of their British citizenship.

He said Britain had just practiced this power in excess of multiple times.

"In thinking about what moves should be made now, I need to think about the wellbeing and security of youngsters living in our nation," Javid composed.

Other European nations that have left the jihadis in SDF detainment are currently being compelled to go up against the circumstance.

"Every German resident — including the individuals who are associated with battling for the supposed Islamic state — have a major directly to go over into Germany," a German outside service source said Sunday.

Belgian equity serve Koen Geens disclosed to Flemish telecaster VRT there was the requirement for an "European arrangement" to the issue, however showed up rankled by Trump's unpolished call.

"It would have been pleasant for amicable countries to have these sorts of inquiries raised through the typical discretionary stations as opposed to a tweet amidst the night," he said in Dutch.View more IT4INT

Saturday, 21 April 2018

ईरान परमाणु समझौते को लेकर होगी डोनाल्ड ट्रंप, एमैनुएल मैक्रों की मुलाकात; सीरिया के हालात पर भी चर्चा

वॉशिंगटन: अमेरिका के राष्ट्रपति डोनाल्ड ट्रंप और फ्रांस के उनके समकक्ष एमैनुएल मैक्रों अगले सप्ताह जब एक - दूसरे से मुलाकात करेंगे तो ईरान समझौते और सीरिया में स्थिति पर चर्चा करेंगे. एक वरिष्ठ अमेरिकी अधिकारी ने बताया कि मैक्रों तीन दिन की आधिकारिक यात्रा पर सोमवार (23 अप्रैल) को यहां पहुंचेंगे. ट्रंप और अमेरिका की प्रथम महिला मेलानिया, फ्रांसीसी राष्ट्रपति का स्वागत करेंगे. अधिकारी ने बताया कि मुलाकात के दौरान दोनों नेताओं के 2015 के ऐतिहासिक परमाणु समझौते पर चर्चा करने की संभावना है. यह समझौता अमेरिका और अन्य विश्व शक्तियों तथा ईरान के बीच हुआ था.

ट्रंप ने परमाणु समझौते से बाहर निकलने की धमकी दी है और इस पर फैसला लेने के लिए 12 मई की समयसीमा तय की है. यह समझौता पूर्व राष्ट्रपति बराक ओबामा के कार्यकाल में हुआ था. अधिकारी ने कहा, ‘‘यह कहना मुश्किल है कि दोनों राष्ट्रपति किन बातों पर चर्चा करेंगे क्योंकि जनवरी में राष्ट्रपति के बयान के आधार पर उनके फैसला लेने से पहले मई के मध्य की समयसीमा तय की गई है.’’

उन्होंने कहा कि अमेरिका दुनियाभर में आतंकवाद से लड़ने के लिए फ्रांस के साथ मिलकर काम करता है. उन्होंने कहा कि ट्रंप और मैक्रों सीरिया में सात अप्रैल को रासायनिक हथियारों के इस्तेमाल के जवाब में संयुक्त अभियान पर भी चर्चा करेंगे. साथ ही वे सीरिया और पश्चिम एशिया से संबंधित सीमा मुद्दों पर भी चर्चा करेंगे. अधिकारी ने यहां संवाददाताओं को बताया कि मैक्रों की यात्रा में 23 अप्रैल को माउंट वर्नोन का दौरा और निजी कपल डिनर शामिल है.

Source:-Zeenews

View More About Our Services:-Mobile Database number Provider and Digital Marketing 

Thursday, 6 April 2017

Syria chemical attack has changed my view of Assad: Donald Trump

Washington DC: United States President Donald Trump has said the concoction assault on Syria`s Idlib region influenced his profoundly and tranformed his reasoning about the Syrian president Bashar al-Assad.

Notwithstanding, amid a joint public interview with King Abdullah of Jordan on Wednesday, Trump at the end of the day blasted his antecedent Barack Obama and his organization for attracting and after that neglecting to uphold a "red line" over Assad`s utilization of substance weapons.

"I imagine that set us back far, in Syria as well as in numerous different parts of the world since it was a clear danger," Trump said. Read more:-International Database

"The substance assault crossed a great deal of lines for me. When you execute guiltless kids, honest children, babies, little infants, with a compound gas that is so deadly - individuals were stunned to hear what gas it was. That crosses numerous, many lines, past a red line, numerous, many lines," he included.

Whenever approached in the event that he would decide on military mediation to expel Assad, Trump stated, "I`m not saying I`m doing anything somehow, however I`m positively not going to let you know . Militarily, I don`t jump at the chance to state where I`m going and what I`m doing."

Friday, 15 July 2016

Nice Attack: Islamic terror, wilful denial and rise of right-wing forces

When a terrorist attack takes place — and most are targeted against unarmed civilians in virtually every sphere of public life — the initial reaction of shock and horror is quickly replaced by anger. Grief needs a catharsis. In absence of the terrorists who have perpetrated the crime, the anger turns towards the political leaders whose job it is to provide security.

The blood has not yet been wiped off the streets of Nice that France has turned against President Francois Hollande. TV channels covering the Thursday night tragedy, showed how unmitigated anger poured out against a President largely seen as effete, ineffective and incapable of preventing waves and waves of terror attacks on French soil.

The attack in Nice was as gruesome a terror strike as any. Latest reports indicate that 84 people were killed when a large white truck, said to be driven by a French-Tunisian citizen, ploughed into a large crowd, who gathered at the beachfront Promenade des Anglais in southern city of Nice for a fireworks display on Bastille Day. Local French media reported that the driver shouted "Allahu Akbar" before taking out his gun and firing several times at the crowd before he was subsequently neutralised.

Bastille Day commemorates the Storming of the Bastille on 14 July, 1789, an important event in the French Revolution. It is marked with a military parade down Paris' most famous boulevard, a presidential address to the nation and a vast fireworks display. Founding values of French Republic, equality, liberty and fraternity, are glorified.

The significance of the day and the fact that a large number of citizens had gathered for celebration — made it a lucrative target. In one fell blow, two purposes were achieved. One, a huge number of people were killed ensuring widespread outrage and non-stop media coverage — aspects which serve as fuel for glorification of terror and draws more and more perpetrators. Two, a symbolic, cruel blow was dealt to the French ideal of syncretism, the bedrock on which the multicultural republic stands.

Source: http://www.firstpost.com

Wednesday, 18 May 2016

Trump, Clinton campaign will be nasty—and that's good news

As the presidential election looks to be featuring two of the most polarizing candidates in modern American politics, we can expect a hard sell of potential stories and ads to try and make Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton more appealing. But the real deciding factor will once again be an avalanche of negative advertising, designed to tear down the policies and besmirch the personal behavior of the other side. Already, commentators are expecting an historical use of negative campaigning. And voters should be thankful for this.

Appropriately, negative ads and campaigns get a very bad rap. They turn off voters, demonize opponents for perfectly acceptable policy disputes and coarsen the political culture — all of these are legitimate complaints. But negative campaigns are still a breath of fresh air compared to the toxic potential of positive ads.

 Positive campaigns may be loved in theory, but in reality they are not idealized "Lincoln vs Douglas" debates, with each side courteously presenting their argument. They are instead frequently issue-free, focused on the perceived personal benefits of the candidate's previous career and sunny pictures of family.

By now, with a stream of embarrassing sex scandals hitting the papers—and with a grandfatherly former Speaker of the House now serving time due to his action related to sexual assaults—we should hope that voters won't buy into the tightly controlled stories about happy political families. But those stories, and the other inspirational pieces about rising from nothing to seek high office, are all part of the same problem of positive campaigns: They are really designed to tell as little as possible about a candidate's actual policy.



Even when they do manage to deal with issues, positive policy proposals are presented in a facile manner, frequently with untruths and a complete unwillingness to face up to the likelihood of success versus failure. Donald Trump's critics have loudly proclaimed that most of his ever-changing policy proclamations are impossible to carry out.

Trump and his supporters have said the same about some of his competitors' plans, and will undoubtedly try to use the same arguments against Clinton. The only way for voters to actually judge these arguments is negative campaigns. Positive ads will not expose the elisions. Only negative ones have any hope of blasting holes and exposing the policy weaknesses of a candidate's pie-in-the-sky plans.

But that is not the biggest benefit of negative ads. They are simply more truthful and fact-based than negative ones. Vanderbilt University Professor John Geer, the author of In "Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns," has noted that negative ads may be unpleasant but they end up presenting vastly more factual information—60 percent more on average—than the shiny happy positive variety.

What negative ads do is present a strong policy contrast for voters, giving them a chance to draw a real distinction between the two candidates. Negative ads distort information—context is always left out and they take the absolute worst possible interpretation of any action by an opponent. But they are usually very issue-based and much more precise and detailed than the positive and glowing ads in favor of a candidate.


Source: http://www.cnbc.com

Wednesday, 4 May 2016

Donald Trump the `presumptive` White House nominee as Cruz crashes out

Donald Trump looked all-but-certain of carrying the Republican Party colors in the 2016 presidential election after the billionaire political novice sent his only serious challenger Ted Cruz crashing out of the race.

Addressing jubilant supporters at Trump Tower in New York after romping to his seventh straight state-wide victory in the Indiana primary, the real estate mogul promised them: "We`re going to win in November, and we`re going to win big, and it`s going to be America first."

Tuesday`s contest in the midwestern state was seen as a final firewall by the "stop Trump" movement seeking to prevent him from locking in the party nomination.

But as the race was called overwhelmingly in Trump`s favor, Cruz conceded to supporters in Indianapolis that he no longer had a viable path forwards.

"We left it all on the field in Indiana," Cruz said. "We gave it everything we`ve got, but the voters chose another path."

"And so with a heavy heart, but with boundless optimism for the long-term future of our nation, we are suspending our campaign."

It was a stunning denouement for the arch-conservative Texas senator who had insisted he would press on to the final day of the Republican race.

His departure leaves the low-polling Ohio Governor John Kasich as Trump`s only challenger for the nomination -- making it a virtual certainty that he will go head to head in a general election matchup with the likely Democratic flagbearer Hillary Clinton.

The top echelon of the Republican establishment said as much minutes after Cruz capitulated, with Republican Party chief Reince Priebus declaring Trump the "presumptive" nominee.

"Donald Trump will be presumptive @GOP nominee, we all need to unite and focus on defeating @HillaryClinton," Priebus said, in an extraordinary move to embrace a candidate the party establishment fought tooth and nail to stop.

Clinton meanwhile suffered an upset in Indiana as her Democratic rival Bernie Sanders mounted a come-from-behind victory, denying the former secretary of state a feather in her cap as she seeks their party`s presidential nomination.

Sanders, a self-declared democratic socialist, beat Clinton by 53.2 percent to 46.8 percent with about three quarters of precincts reporting -- although Clinton remained well ahead in the overall delegate battle for the nomination.Cruz had been hoping to use the midwestern state to block Trump from receiving the 1,237 delegates needed to secure the nomination ahead of the Republican convention in Cleveland in July.

But the bombastic real estate mogul -- who has thus far defied all political logic to lead the Republican race -- swept the arch-conservative senator aside.

Trump was leading Cruz by about 53 percent to 37 percent, with Kasich languished at less than eight percent.

"Lyin` Ted Cruz consistently said that he will, and must, win Indiana. If he doesn`t he should drop out of the race-stop wasting time & money," Trump taunted in a tweet.

With 1,002 delegates to his name, Trump was already in favorable position to reach the magic number needed to avoid a contested party convention. With Cruz out of the race, crossing the threshold is a foregone conclusion for Trump.

Even before the Indiana results, Trump and Clinton had pivoted toward one another.

"I`m really focused on moving into the general election," Clinton said confidently Tuesday in West Virginia.

"That`s where we have to be because we are going to have a tough campaign against a candidate who`ll literally say or do anything," she said of Trump. "We`re going to take him on at every turn."

Cruz`s exit comes after the primary battle took a nasty turn Tuesday when Trump cited a tabloid report linking Cruz`s father Rafael to John F. Kennedy assassin Lee Harvey Oswald.

Trump raised the recent National Enquirer story in his interview with Fox News.

"This is just kooky," an irate Cruz shot back while stumping in Evansville, Indiana, branding Trump a "pathological liar."

"The man is utterly amoral," said Cruz, adding that "we are staring at the abyss" if Trump wins the White House. Source: http://zeenews.india.com